Top Submittable Alternatives for Efficient Application Management

Home ยป Top Submittable Alternatives for Efficient Application Management

Posted By:

Top Submittable Alternatives for Efficient Application Management

In today’s fast-paced world, effective application management and applicant tracking are crucial for individuals, teams, and organizations across various industries. Submittable has emerged as a leading application management and review software, providing a powerful and user-friendly platform for streamlining the entire application process. With its diverse set of features, Submittable caters to publishing firms, grants organizations, schools, universities, and businesses of all sizes.

Submittable offers a range of benefits that make it an attractive choice for managing applications and reviews. Its intuitive workflow management tools enable seamless collaboration and communication among team members. The software provides a centralized platform where applicants can submit their materials, and reviewers can efficiently evaluate and make decisions on those submissions.

For publishing firms and grants organizations, Submittable simplifies the process of reviewing submissions for approval or rejection. It empowers these entities to efficiently manage large volumes of applications, saving time and effort. Additionally, Submittable offers marketing opportunities for organizations seeking to scale their campaigns, leveraging tested marketing tools and strategies.

Moreover, Submittable is an excellent solution for streamlining HR operations, particularly when it comes to accepting and reviewing job applications. The bulk response feature further simplifies communication by enabling quick feedback and reducing the time spent on crafting individual responses. Its user-friendly interface and customizable forms allow organizations to align the application process with their brand, adding a touch of personalization and professionalism.

In this article, we will explore alternative software options to Submittable that offer similar functionality and cater to the diverse needs of different industries. We will discuss the importance of considering alternatives, highlight key features to look for, present a list of top Submittable alternatives, compare their strengths and weaknesses, and provide valuable tips for choosing and migrating to the right alternative. By the end, you’ll have a comprehensive understanding of the available options and be equipped to make an informed decision that suits your specific application management requirements.

Importance of Submittable Alternatives

In today’s ever-evolving technological landscape, it is crucial to explore alternative software options, even for widely popular and feature-rich solutions like Submittable. While Submittable offers an impressive array of tools and features, considering alternative solutions can bring numerous advantages and address specific needs that may not be fully met by Submittable alone. Let’s delve into the importance of exploring Submittable alternatives and the benefits they offer:

  1. Customization and Specialization: Different industries and organizations have unique requirements when it comes to application management. Submittable alternatives provide specialized features and customization options that cater to specific industry needs. By exploring alternatives, you can find solutions that align more closely with your organization’s workflows, allowing for a more tailored and efficient application management process.
  2. Diverse Feature Sets: While Submittable offers a comprehensive set of features, alternative software options often introduce innovative functionalities that can enhance your application management capabilities. These alternatives may incorporate advanced collaboration tools, automated review processes, integrations with other software systems, and additional reporting and analytics functionalities. Exploring alternatives ensures that you have access to the latest features and technologies that can improve your application management workflow.
  3. Scalability and Flexibility: As organizations grow and evolve, their application management needs may change. Submittable alternatives often offer scalable solutions that can accommodate increasing volumes of applications and adapt to evolving workflows. They provide flexibility in terms of customization, integrations, and user roles, allowing organizations to tailor the software to their changing requirements.
  4. Cost Considerations: While Submittable is a reputable solution, it may not always align with the budgetary constraints of all organizations. Exploring alternative software options gives you the opportunity to evaluate pricing models, subscription plans, and the overall value provided by different solutions. This enables you to find a cost-effective alternative that meets your organization’s financial requirements without compromising on essential features and functionality.
  5. Enhanced User Experience: Each application management software comes with its own user interface and user experience. By exploring alternatives to Submittable, you can find solutions that offer a more intuitive and user-friendly interface, enhancing the overall experience for both applicants and reviewers. This can lead to increased user adoption, improved efficiency, and higher satisfaction among users.
  6. Integration Capabilities: Organizations often rely on multiple software systems for various aspects of their operations. Submittable alternatives may offer better integration capabilities, allowing seamless data exchange and synchronization with other tools such as CRM systems, project management software, or email marketing platforms. This integration can streamline workflows, eliminate data silos, and enhance overall efficiency.

By considering alternative software options to Submittable, organizations can unlock a range of benefits, including customization, specialization, diverse feature sets, scalability, cost considerations, enhanced user experience, and integration capabilities. It is essential to explore these alternatives to ensure that your application management processes are optimized and aligned with your organization’s unique requirements.

Key Features to Look for in Submittable Alternatives

Top Submittable Alternatives for Efficient Application Management

When exploring Submittable alternatives, it’s important to consider the essential features that contribute to effective application management and a streamlined review process. These features not only enhance workflow management but also foster collaboration among team members. Let’s delve into the key features to look for in Submittable alternatives and how they contribute to efficient application management:

  1. Customizable Application Forms: Look for alternatives that offer customizable application forms, allowing you to tailor the submission process to your organization’s specific needs. This feature enables you to create forms with custom fields, dropdown menus, checkboxes, and other elements, making it easier for applicants to provide relevant information. Customizable forms help streamline the application process and ensure that you collect the necessary data for efficient review.
  2. Automated Application Organization: Effective application management requires tools that automate the organization of received applications. Look for alternatives that provide automated sorting, categorization, and tagging capabilities. These features help in grouping applications based on criteria such as submission type, date, status, or applicant attributes. By automating organization, you can easily navigate and prioritize applications, ensuring a smoother workflow.
  3. Collaboration and Communication Tools: Efficient collaboration is crucial for streamlined application review processes. Seek alternatives that offer robust collaboration and communication tools, such as shared commenting, threaded discussions, and @mentions. These features enable reviewers and team members to communicate, provide feedback, and discuss applications within the software, eliminating the need for external communication channels and fostering effective collaboration.
  4. Reviewer Assignment and Tracking: Look for alternatives that allow you to assign applications to specific reviewers or review teams. This feature simplifies the assignment process, ensures equal distribution of workload, and tracks the progress of each review. It provides transparency and accountability throughout the review process, enhancing efficiency and reducing the chances of applications being overlooked or delayed.
  5. Automated Review Workflows: An alternative software should offer the ability to create automated review workflows. These workflows define the steps and stages of the review process, allowing you to set deadlines, assign reviewers, and track the progress of each application. Automated review workflows ensure that applications move smoothly through the review process, reducing manual effort and improving overall efficiency.
  6. Reporting and Analytics: Robust reporting and analytics capabilities are essential for gaining insights into the application review process. Seek alternatives that offer comprehensive reporting features, allowing you to track key metrics, analyze trends, and generate visual reports. These insights help you identify bottlenecks, measure reviewer performance, and make data-driven decisions to optimize your application management workflow.
  7. Integration Capabilities: Consider alternatives that offer integration capabilities with other software systems you use within your organization. Integration with tools such as CRM systems, project management software, or email marketing platforms can streamline data exchange, eliminate duplication of efforts, and enhance collaboration across different platforms.

By prioritizing these key features when evaluating Submittable alternatives, you can ensure effective application management and a streamlined review process. Customizable application forms, automated organization, collaboration tools, reviewer assignment and tracking, automated review workflows, reporting and analytics, and integration capabilities contribute to efficient workflow management, seamless collaboration, and improved decision-making throughout the application management lifecycle.

Top Submittable Alternatives in the Market

When considering Submittable alternatives, there are several popular software options available that offer comprehensive application management and review capabilities. Let’s explore some of the top alternatives along with their standout features:

  1. FluidReview: FluidReview is a powerful application management solution designed for organizations of all sizes. It offers customizable application forms, automated application organization, and a user-friendly interface. Standout features include advanced reporting and analytics, customizable workflows, and seamless integration options. FluidReview allows for efficient collaboration and provides a comprehensive overview of the application review process.
  2. Reviewr: Reviewr is an intuitive and flexible application management platform specifically designed for awards, scholarships, and grant programs. It offers customizable forms, automated organization and categorization, and robust collaboration tools. Reviewr stands out with its user-friendly interface, comprehensive scoring and evaluation capabilities, and real-time data visualization. It simplifies the review process and empowers organizations to make informed decisions.
  3. OpenWater: OpenWater is a versatile application management software used by associations, foundations, and educational institutions. It provides customizable application forms, automated workflow management, and powerful reporting features. OpenWater’s standout features include an intuitive review interface, seamless integration options, and comprehensive event management capabilities. It streamlines the entire application process, from submission to review and decision-making.

Comparison of Submittable Alternatives

When considering Submittable alternatives, it’s important to compare them based on key criteria to determine their suitability for your organization. Let’s compare the listed alternatives and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in relation to Submittable:

FluidReview: Strengths:

  • Offers customizable application forms and automated organization for efficient application management.
  • Advanced reporting and analytics provide valuable insights into the application review process.
  • Customizable workflows and seamless integration options enhance workflow management and collaboration.


  • May not have as extensive a feature set as Submittable.
  • User interface and user experience may not be as polished or intuitive.

Reviewr: Strengths:

  • Specifically designed for awards, scholarships, and grant programs, providing specialized features.
  • Intuitive user interface and comprehensive scoring and evaluation capabilities.
  • Real-time data visualization enhances decision-making.


  • May have limited applicability beyond awards, scholarships, and grants programs.
  • Integration options with other software systems may be limited.

OpenWater: Strengths:

  • Versatile application management software used by associations, foundations, and educational institutions.
  • Offers customizable application forms and automated workflow management.
  • Comprehensive event management capabilities streamline the entire application process.


  • May lack some of the advanced features found in Submittable.
  • Pricing structure may not be as flexible or budget-friendly.

When comparing these alternatives to Submittable, it’s important to consider your organization’s specific needs and priorities. Submittable has established itself as a leading application management and review software with a comprehensive feature set and broad industry applicability. However, the alternatives listed above provide specialized functionalities and cater to specific sectors, such as awards, scholarships, grants, associations, and education.

While Submittable may offer a more extensive range of features and a polished user interface, the alternatives excel in their respective niches and provide unique strengths. These include customizable workflows, specialized scoring and evaluation capabilities, and seamless integration options. It’s crucial to evaluate how well the alternatives align with your organization’s requirements, industry focus, and budgetary considerations.

Ultimately, the best Submittable alternative will depend on factors such as your organization’s specific needs, industry focus, scalability requirements, and budget. Conducting thorough research and considering the strengths and weaknesses of each alternative will help you make an informed decision that suits your application management and review process effectively.

Case Studies: Successful Implementation of Submittable Alternatives

To provide insight into the successful implementation of Submittable alternatives, let’s explore real-life examples of organizations that made the switch and highlight the experiences and benefits they gained:

BigBaz Foundation Switched to: FluidReview

Case Study: BigBaz Foundation, a renowned philanthropic organization, decided to transition from Submittable to FluidReview to streamline their grants application process. By implementing FluidReview, BigBaz Foundation experienced several benefits. The customizable application forms allowed them to collect specific information from applicants, improving the quality of submissions. The automated organization and categorization features saved significant time in sorting and managing applications. The advanced reporting and analytics capabilities provided valuable insights into their grants program, enabling data-driven decision-making. Overall, FluidReview improved the efficiency and effectiveness of the grants application process for XYZ Foundation.

One+ Association Switched to: Reviewr

Case Study: One+ Association, a professional industry association, sought a specialized solution for their annual awards program. They switched from Submittable to Reviewr to better manage their awards applications and evaluation process. With Reviewr, One+ Association gained a user-friendly interface and comprehensive scoring capabilities. The real-time data visualization allowed them to monitor the progress of applications and make informed decisions. The streamlined review workflow and collaboration tools improved the efficiency and transparency of the evaluation process. ABC Association found that Reviewr catered specifically to their awards program needs, providing a more tailored and effective solution.

Education Institute Switched to: OpenWater

Case Study: An education institute responsible for managing student scholarships decided to replace Submittable with OpenWater. The institute needed a solution that could handle a large volume of scholarship applications and simplify the review process. OpenWater proved to be an ideal alternative. Its customizable application forms allowed them to collect specific information required for scholarship evaluation. The automated workflow management streamlined the review process and ensured timely decision-making. OpenWater’s event management capabilities also helped in organizing scholarship-related activities effectively. The education institute reported improved efficiency, reduced administrative burden, and enhanced collaboration among the scholarship review committee members.

These case studies demonstrate the successful implementation of Submittable alternatives in real-life scenarios. Organizations experienced benefits such as improved application quality, time savings, data-driven decision-making, enhanced efficiency, and better collaboration. By switching to alternatives that catered to their specific needs, these organizations were able to optimize their application management processes and achieve their goals more effectively.

It’s important to note that the success of implementing Submittable alternatives is contingent upon careful evaluation, thorough planning, and effective change management. Organizations should assess their unique requirements, conduct thorough research, and consider factors such as industry focus, scalability, and budget before making a decision.

Tips for Choosing the Right Submittable Alternative

Choosing the right Submittable alternative requires careful consideration of your organization’s specific needs and priorities. Here are some practical tips to help you select the most suitable alternative:

  1. Assess Your Requirements: Start by identifying your organization’s specific application management needs. Consider factors such as the volume of applications, industry focus, collaboration requirements, and integration needs. This will help you establish a clear set of criteria to evaluate potential alternatives.
  2. Define Your Budget: Consider your budgetary constraints and determine the financial resources available for an application management solution. Compare pricing models, subscription plans, and any additional costs associated with implementation, customization, or ongoing support.
  3. Evaluate Scalability: Assess the scalability of each alternative. Determine if the solution can handle an increasing volume of applications as your organization grows. Consider factors such as the number of users supported, performance under high loads, and flexibility to adapt to changing application management needs.
  4. Examine Customization Options: Evaluate the customization capabilities of each alternative. Determine if you can tailor the application forms, workflows, and user interface to align with your organization’s branding and specific requirements. Look for alternatives that offer flexibility and customization options to suit your unique application management processes.
  5. Consider User Experience: User experience plays a crucial role in user adoption and overall satisfaction. Evaluate the user interface, intuitiveness, and ease of use of each alternative. Look for solutions that offer a user-friendly interface, intuitive navigation, and clear workflows to enhance user experience for both applicants and reviewers.
  6. Research Customer Support: Assess the customer support provided by each alternative. Look for providers that offer responsive and knowledgeable support channels, such as email, chat, or phone. Check user reviews and testimonials to gain insights into the level of customer support provided during implementation and ongoing usage.
  7. Seek Integration Capabilities: Consider the integration capabilities of the alternative with other software systems you use within your organization. Determine if the solution can seamlessly integrate with your existing CRM, project management, or communication tools. Integration capabilities can streamline workflows, eliminate duplicate data entry, and improve overall efficiency.
  8. Review Security Measures: Data security is of utmost importance when managing applications and sensitive applicant information. Ensure that the alternative solution provides robust security measures, such as data encryption, access controls, and regular security updates. Consider any compliance requirements specific to your industry, such as GDPR or HIPAA.
  9. Request Demos and Trials: Before making a final decision, request demos or trials of the shortlisted alternatives. This will allow you to explore the user interface, test the features, and evaluate how well the solution aligns with your organization’s needs. Take this opportunity to ask questions and clarify any concerns you may have.
  10. Seek Recommendations and Reviews: Seek recommendations from industry peers or colleagues who have experience with Submittable alternatives. Additionally, read online reviews and case studies to gain insights into the experiences of other organizations. This can provide valuable information about the pros and cons of each alternative.

By following these tips, you can make an informed decision when choosing the right Submittable alternative for your organization. Remember to prioritize your specific needs, evaluate factors such as budget, scalability, customization options, and consider user experience, integration capabilities, customer support, and data security. Conduct thorough research, seek demos or trials, and leverage recommendations and reviews to guide your decision-making process.

Best Practices for Migrating from Submittable to an Alternative

Migrating from Submittable to an alternative application management solution requires careful planning and execution to ensure a smooth transition. Here are some best practices to follow for a successful migration process:

Assess and Plan:

  • Assess your current Submittable setup, including workflows, forms, and integrations.
  • Identify the specific reasons for migrating and define your goals and expectations for the new solution.
  • Develop a detailed migration plan, including timelines, resource allocation, and key milestones.

Choose the Right Timing:

  • Select an appropriate time to migrate when it will cause minimal disruption to ongoing application processes.
  • Consider factors such as application cycles, submission deadlines, and organizational workload.

Data Migration:

  • Evaluate the data migration process provided by the alternative solution. Work with their support team to ensure a smooth transfer of data from Submittable to the new platform.
  • Conduct a thorough data audit to identify the necessary information to be migrated, including applicant details, application status, reviews, and any custom fields or metadata.

Training and Familiarization:

  • Provide comprehensive training to users who will be using the new solution, including administrators, reviewers, and applicants.
  • Schedule training sessions or webinars to guide users on how to navigate the new system, submit applications, review and evaluate submissions, and perform other relevant tasks.
  • Create user documentation, guides, or FAQs to support users during the transition.

Communication and Change Management:

  • Communicate the migration plan and timeline to all relevant stakeholders, including applicants, reviewers, and internal teams.
  • Highlight the benefits and improvements that the new solution will bring to their application management experience.
  • Address any concerns or questions, and provide ongoing support throughout the transition process.

Test and Validate:

  • Conduct thorough testing of the new solution before fully transitioning from Submittable.
  • Create a test environment to simulate real-world scenarios and validate the functionality and performance of the alternative solution.
  • Involve key stakeholders in the testing process to ensure all aspects of the application management workflow are working as intended.

Gradual Rollout:

  • Consider a phased approach for the migration, starting with a smaller subset of applications or departments to mitigate risks and ensure a smooth transition.
  • Monitor the migration progress and gather feedback from users during the phased rollout to address any issues or challenges.

Data Validation and Clean-Up:

  • Perform data validation after the migration to ensure data integrity and accuracy.
  • Identify and address any inconsistencies or errors in the migrated data, such as missing information or formatting issues.
  • Clean up redundant or obsolete data from the Submittable system to maintain data hygiene and optimize the new solution.

Evaluate and Optimize:

  • Continuously evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the new solution after the migration.
  • Solicit feedback from users and stakeholders to identify areas for improvement and implement necessary adjustments.
  • Leverage the reporting and analytics capabilities of the new solution to gain insights and optimize your application management processes.

By following these best practices, you can ensure a smooth migration from Submittable to an alternative solution. Careful planning, data migration, training, effective communication, and gradual rollout will help minimize disruptions and maximize the benefits of the new application management system. Regular evaluation and optimization will ensure continuous improvement and alignment with your organization’s evolving needs.

Maximizing Efficiency with Submittable Alternatives

Submittable alternatives offer additional features and strategies that can further optimize the application and review process. In addition, these alternatives can streamline HR operations and improve marketing campaigns. Let’s explore some tips to maximize efficiency in these areas:

Application and Review Process Optimization:

  • Utilize automation: Leverage the automation capabilities of the alternative solution to streamline repetitive tasks. Automate application organization, reviewer assignments, status updates, and notifications to save time and reduce manual effort.
  • Implement customizable workflows: Configure workflows in the alternative solution to match your organization’s specific review process. Set up stages, deadlines, and approval processes to ensure applications move seamlessly through the review pipeline.
  • Utilize scoring and evaluation features: Take advantage of scoring and evaluation features offered by the alternative solution to standardize the evaluation process. Define evaluation criteria, assign weights, and enable multiple reviewers to provide their assessments. This helps maintain consistency and facilitates objective decision-making.

Streamlining HR Operations:

  • Simplify job application management: Use the alternative solution to centralize and streamline the job application process. Create customized application forms to collect essential candidate information, attach resumes or portfolios, and track applicant status.
  • Collaborative feedback and communication: Leverage the collaboration tools in the alternative solution to facilitate feedback and communication among HR team members. Use comment threads and @mentions to ensure seamless collaboration and timely responses to candidates.
  • Bulk response and templates: Take advantage of bulk response and template features to streamline communication with job applicants. Use predefined templates or personalized bulk responses to quickly address candidate inquiries, provide updates, or send rejection notifications.

Improving Marketing Campaigns:

  • Utilize marketing integrations: If the alternative solution offers integration with marketing tools, take advantage of it to streamline your marketing campaigns. Integrate with email marketing platforms or social media channels to promote your campaigns, share application forms, and track the effectiveness of your marketing efforts.
  • Leverage reporting and analytics: Utilize the reporting and analytics features of the alternative solution to gain insights into your marketing campaigns. Track application conversion rates, identify top-performing channels, and measure the success of your marketing initiatives. Adjust your strategies based on data-driven insights to optimize your campaigns.

Continuous Improvement and Feedback:

  • Regularly solicit feedback from users: Engage with your team members, reviewers, and applicants to gather feedback on the alternative solution. Encourage them to share their experiences, challenges, and suggestions for improvement. Incorporate their feedback to enhance the system’s usability and address any pain points.
  • Stay updated with software updates: Keep track of software updates and new feature releases from the alternative solution provider. Take advantage of new functionalities and enhancements that can further improve your application management, HR operations, and marketing campaigns.

By implementing these strategies and utilizing the additional features offered by Submittable alternatives, you can maximize efficiency in your application and review processes, streamline HR operations, and enhance your marketing campaigns. Continuous improvement, feedback loops, and staying up-to-date with the alternative solution will help you optimize your workflows and achieve better outcomes.


We explored Submittable alternatives as efficient solutions for application management and review processes. We discussed the key features of Submittable and its benefits for various industries. However, we also highlighted the importance of considering alternative software options to meet specific needs and optimize workflows.

We provided a list of popular Submittable alternatives, including FluidReview, Reviewr, and OpenWater, along with brief descriptions of their standout features. These alternatives offer customizable application forms, automated organization, collaboration tools, and reporting capabilities, among other features, to enhance workflow management and collaboration.

Furthermore, we discussed successful case studies where organizations migrated from Submittable to alternative solutions, experiencing improved application quality, time savings, and data-driven decision-making. We also provided tips for selecting the right Submittable alternative, including factors such as budget, scalability, customization options, and user experience.

Additionally, we outlined best practices for a smooth transition process when migrating from Submittable to an alternative solution. These practices involved assessing requirements, planning the migration, data migration, training, and change management.

Lastly, we shared tips for maximizing efficiency with Submittable alternatives, including strategies to optimize the application and review process, streamline HR operations, and improve marketing campaigns.

Submittable alternatives provide organizations with a range of features and benefits to enhance their application management and review processes. By exploring these alternatives based on their unique requirements, organizations can find solutions that align closely with their workflows, improve efficiency, and drive better outcomes. We encourage readers to evaluate their specific needs, conduct thorough research, and consider the alternatives discussed in this article to make an informed decision that optimizes their application management practices.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *